The Neuroscience of Mind Uploading and The Psychology of The Digital Afterlife
Benjamin Franklin famously said, “In this world, nothing is certain except death and taxes”. As a society, people have always tried to cheat on their taxes. More recently, people are getting serious about cheating death.
Investments in breakthrough medical technologies have never been stronger. Craig Venter, who mapped the human genome in 2007, founded Human Longevity Inc. in 2014 to end aging, and extend the human lifespan. Google’s Calico invests tens of millions of dollars a year into ‘long-shot’ life extension medical technologies.
On an individual level, billionaire Peter Thiel receives injections of blood from younger individuals. Some may find the unorthodox methodology disturbing (it was famously parodied in HBO’s Silicon Valley), but few can fault the motivation behind it. Who can disagree with wanting to cheat death?
More recently, ideas about life extension have taken another turn. Enter the world of mind uploading, and the promise of a digital afterlife.
The Neuroscience of the Mind Uploading and Digital Afterlife
Here, the idea isn't to make the human body everlasting, but rather, to make it obsolete. Why try to cure an ailing, biological body when you can just copy the essential bit (e.g. your mind) and upload it onto a virtual interface?
The idea is to upload a person’s mind in its entirety into physical storage. And once there, migrating the ‘person’ into an avatar within a stimulated, digital world. Think Second Life or Animal Crossing, but instead of controlling your avatar remotely, you (via your uploaded mind) are the avatar.
Ideas about a digital afterlife have inspired a wave of science fiction, from Johnny Depp’s Transcendence, Amazon’s Upload, to several Black Mirror episodes. But how far are we from these fantasies? As scientists team up with Silicon Valley giants, could a digital afterlife be possible?
Where to start? Mind uploading is predicated on monism, the idea that the mind and the brain are fundamentally the same entity. That is, “you”—in all of your thoughts, emotions, memories and human complexity—IS your physical brain.
Based on a range of findings from neuropsychology (studying patients with severe brain injury), as well as neuro-imaging techniques such as fMRI, EEG, and TMS, this is consistent with current scientific thinking. So far, so good. If your aim is to localize a person’s essence for upload, the brain is undoubtedly the spot.
Therefore if you could, in principle, copy or upload the human brain to an external source, you could copy the person’s essence. Not their body or skin, but their personality, memories, and core “self”. All of it is encoded in a complex web of neuronal connections, which somehow comes together to create “you”, the conscious, self-aware being. As philosopher Rebecca Goldstein notes,
“Sure, consciousness is a matter of matter—what else could it be, since that’s what we are—but still, the fact that some hunks of matter have an inner life . . . is unlike any other properties of matter we have yet encountered, much less accounted for. The laws of matter in motion can produce this, all this? Suddenly, matter wakes up and takes in the world?”
Now, identifying the goal is the easy part. The difficulty comes with doing this at the scale required.
Neuroscience and Neuro-Imaging At Scale
The primary challenge of mind uploading comes with capturing the brain’s incredible complexity. Every memory you can access, every non-trivial experience in your life that’s had an impression, all of the nuances of your personality, the impact of culture, etc. Each person is incredibly complex, nearly beyond measure.
In fact, the only thing matching this complexity is the brain itself. The computational power of the brain comes from neurons, and the human brain contains about 90 billion of them. Think about how many blades of grass are on a football field and then, double that. Then, consider the synapses—the vast, interconnected links between neurons, which allow the brain to communicate. The brain has over 100 trillion of these synapses. Think about how many blades of grass there are on a football field, and multiply it by 1,000.
Your brain, your ‘self’, in all of its neuronal and syntactic complexity is called a connectome. Think genome, but for the brain. And this is what needs to be copied. As Neuroscientist Michael Graziano remarks,
“..if we could measure all the neurons in someone’s brain, catalog which ones are connected to which, and characterize those synapses, we’d have the essence of the person. The idea is that if scientists were able to map the human genome, an accomplishment once thought to be impossible, then they can tackle an even greater technical challenge and map the human connectome. Each person has his or her own unique connectome, defining a unique mind.”
So far so good, right? Easy peasy?
Indeed, in January of 2020 the entire connectome of a fruit fly was modeled in exactly this way, in all of its synaptic connectivity. Science is making progress. Let’s look at how we can apply this to humans.
The Business of Connectomes
The difficulty, of course, is that the human brain is much more complex. The connectome for the fruitfly took 12 years and cost over $40 million. It has about 25,000 neurons and 20 million synaptic connections. Recall that the human brain has over 90 million neurons, and over 100 trillion synaptic connections. As Neuroscientist V.S. Ramachandran once remarked, given the brain’s complexity - that there are more possible combinations and permutations of possible brain states than there are elemental particles in the known universe.
Capturing this level of detail sounds forlorn. This doesn’t make a human connectome impossible in principle, but it does add significant difficulty. MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) machines are technically designed for this very thing - taking a high resolution, 3D images of the brain. High quality, 3D images can be generated pain-free in less than 20 minutes.
The 3D image created by MRI looks great at first glance. But when we drill down, it comes nowhere close to capturing the complexity and detail of a complete connectome. Today’s highest resolution MRI machines can take a picture of about half of a cubic millimeter. To capture an individual synapse of neurons, we’d need a resolution two orders of magnitude more sharp - a thousandth of a millimeter.
But even if we could get that degree of resolution, we’d still be omitting crucial elements of the brain. For example, certain synapses are more potent than others, and certain synapses communicate with different neurotransmitters. These may seem like small differences, but slight inaccuracies in recording these ‘nuances’ change the very fabric of the ‘person’. Capturing these would be crucial to maintaining an accurate connectome, and would likely require entirely different technology.
Lastly, while it’s understood that the lion’s share of the brain’s computation comes from neurons, other cells in the brain, such as glia also play important roles in supporting the brain. Most of this has to do with providing the brain’s physical integrity, but recent findings suggest they also impact processing through the secretion of certain chemicals on neurons and synapses. Ignoring these additional ‘nuances’, and the whole connectome is fundamentally altered.
It’s worth noting that, not only are the technical hurdles immense but the margin for error is slim to none. Even if the connectome is 99.9%, that .01% can be massively influential - tilting essential aspects of your psychological experience in drastic ways. As Graziano points out, concussions - which cause minor swelling of the brain, can lead to dizziness, memory problems, and headaches that linger on for months.
Considering every aspect of one’s psychological experience and moment-to-moment experience (pain, anger, terror, and all negative emotions very much included), it’s hard to know just how excruciatingly disruptive small differences could be.
Digital Afterlife Meets Reality
So, where does this leave us? Sure, it may be human nature to want to live forever. But to do this in practice, we’ve got a ways to go. The sheer scale of the brain presents a potentially insurmountable hurdle in the brain copying process. Beyond that, even if we were able to precisely copy a brain and upload, there is still the immense technical challenge of having the ‘person’ control an Avatar remotely via their own brain activity.
Not to mention, the ethical quagmire of who to select for such an expensive, elaborate procedure. Simply granting everlasting life to the highest bidder would leave out many others who are potentially more deserving (and who’s everlasting insights would be more beneficial to society as a whole).
However, the digital afterlife remains an interesting area to monitor. In principle, it remains a technical possibility, even if it has a long way to go. When it comes to Franklin’s famous axiom, death remains a certainty. Until further notice, we’d have better luck with taxes.
Photo by @felipepelaquim via UnSplash
About the author
Matt Johnson, PhD is a researcher, writer, and consumer neuroscientist focusing on the application of psychology to branding. He is the author of the best-selling consumer psychology book Blindsight, and Branding That Means Business (Economist Books, Fall 2022). Contact Matt for speaking engagements, opportunities to collaborate, or just to say hello
References for Mind Uploading and The Neuroscience of Connectomes
Barber, G. (Jan 2020) The Most Complete Brain Map Ever Is Here: A Fly's 'Connectome', Wired
B. A. Barres, B. Stevens, and M. R. Freeman, Glia (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2014).
Goldstein, R (2012) “The Hard Problem of Consciousness and the Solitude of the Poet,” Tin House 13, no. 3 (2012): 3.
Gong, Y. He, L. Concha, C. Lebel, D. W. Gross, A. C. Evans, and C. Beaulieu (2009). Mapping Anatomical Connectivity Patterns of Human Cerebral Cortex Using In Vivo Diffusion Tensor Imaging Tractography, Cerebral Cortex 19 (2009): 524–36
Graziano, Michael S A.(2020) Rethinking Consciousness: A Scientific Theory of Subjective Experience (p. 138). W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition.
Jones, R. (Nov 2018). Peter Thiel Goes On the Record About Injections of Young Blood, Gizmodo
Ramachandran, V.S. (1998) Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the mysteries of the mind, New York, NY: Harper Collins
